Volume 7, Issue 1 (8-2025)                   Tabari Biomed Stu Res J 2025, 7(1): 45-60 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Younesi Rostami M, Gholami J, Rohaninia E. Renal Stones in Infants and Preschool Children: A Narrative Review of Treatment Selection Among Shock Wave Lithotripsy, Flexible Ureteroscopy/Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, and Mini-PCNL. Tabari Biomed Stu Res J 2025; 7 (1) :45-60
URL: http://tbsrj.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-3922-en.html
1- Associate Professor of Endourology, Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Sari Imam Khomeini Hospital, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences
2- Assistant Professor of Urology, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences
3- Medical Student, Department of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
Abstract:  
Background: Pediatric nephrolithiasis is increasingly recognized and carries a substantial lifetime recurrence burden. Infants and preschool children are uniquely challenging because of small-caliber urinary tracts, limited physiologic reserve, anesthesia exposure, radiation sensitivity, and the possibility of metabolic or genetic disease.
Objective: To narratively synthesize clinically relevant evidence guiding treatment selection among shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), flexible ureteroscopy/retrograde intrarenal surgery (fURS/RIRS), and miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) in infants and preschool-aged children.
Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE-indexed literature, current European Association of Urology (EAU) guidance, and citation tracking of key pediatric studies were reviewed through September 2026. Evidence was selected for clinical relevance to renal stone management in children, with emphasis on infant- and preschool-specific cohorts, comparative studies, major pediatric series, and evidence syntheses. The review is narrative rather than systematic; study findings were interpreted in context rather than statistically pooled de novo.
Results: SWL remains the least invasive intervention and is suitable for many small, targetable renal stones, but retreatment can increase cumulative anesthesia burden. fURS/RIRS provides active clearance without renal puncture and is useful for SWL-unfavorable stones, although small ureteral caliber may necessitate prestenting or staged access. Mini-PCNL offers efficient clearance of larger or complex burdens but carries greater tract-related bleeding and access concerns. Preschool-specific comparisons show that differences in single-session stone-free rate may narrow after auxiliary procedures, making cumulative procedural burden a key treatment endpoint
Type of Study: Review | Subject: Kidney, Urinary and Genital Surgery (urology)
Published: 2025/08/19 | ePublished: 2025/08/19

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Tabari Biomedical Student Research Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb